Drawing for REPUBLIC OF CUERVO GOLD NATION OF UNTAMED SPIRITS

USPTO serial 75053453

REPUBLIC OF CUERVO GOLD NATION OF UNTAMED SPIRITS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REPUBLIC OF CUERVO GOLD NATION OF UNTAMED SPIRITS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033alcoholic beverages, namely, tequilaACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 19, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 11, 2001EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 27, 2001EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 16, 2001EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 26, 2000EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 19, 2000EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 27, 2000EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 25, 1999EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 29, 1999EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 10, 1999DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 14, 1999EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 22, 1999EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 22, 1999DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 1998NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 27, 1998PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 4, 1998PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 1997IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Jun 3, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 11, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 7, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 12, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 8, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance