USPTO serial 75053725
PRODUCT OF ACHIEVEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRODUCT OF ACHIEVEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Unionville, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R. Lake
JAMES R LAKE RIDOUT & MAYBEESTE 2400ONE QUEEN ST ETORONTO, ON M5C 3B1Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | production of radio and television programs featuring awards recognition for the products of others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 13, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |