USPTO serial 75054459
POWERPRISM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEIGELL, CHARLES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POWERPRISM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL W HICKS
LORI N BOATRIGHT BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD 7TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | computer system and network diagnostic services; on-line services in the nature of providing access to a global computer network; computer consultation services in the nature of network and system analysis for sourcing information and decoding critical relationships between data sources in order to incorporate the collection, storage, manipulation and modeling capabilities of said networks and systems; updating of computer software and software design for others; computer network and system design for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 17, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 27, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 8, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |