USPTO serial 75055182
JUAN VALDEZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JUAN VALDEZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JANE SHAY WALD
MIRIAM C BREEZY POMS, SMITH, LANDE & ROSE, PC2029 CENTURY PARK E 38TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90067-3024UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computers, printed circuit boards, semiconductor devices, integrated circuits, computer software for use in designing and creating other computer software and instructional manuals provided therewith | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 14, 1998 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 14, 1998 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 5, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 16, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 21, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 21, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 24, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 1996 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 29, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |