USPTO serial 75055406
CARE NAVIGATOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALVES, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CARE NAVIGATOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberta Jacobs-Meadway
1735 MARKET ST51ST FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7599Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | printed survey, informational, instructional, educational, and teaching materials for use in disease management and preventative health care | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 8, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 8, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 29, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 10, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |