Drawing for CARE NAVIGATOR

USPTO serial 75055408

CARE NAVIGATOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALVES, RICHARD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CARE NAVIGATOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERTA JACOBS-MEADWAY

1735 MARKET ST51ST FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7599

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035management for the health benefit plans of others; health care utilization and review services; health care cost reviewACTIVESep 1, 2000
041educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, conferences, workshops, individual learning modules for use in disease management and preventive health care, and distributing course materials in connection therewith; development and dissemination of educational materials in the field of health care management, disease management, health risk assessment and preventive health careACTIVESep 1, 2000
042managed health care services; consultation and research for use in health care management, disease management, health risk assessment and preventive health careACTIVESep 1, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 7, 2004PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Apr 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 4, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 28, 2000SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 13, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 27, 2000EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 22, 2000EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 15, 1999EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 15, 1999EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 21, 1999EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 15, 1999EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 9, 1998EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 16, 1998EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 18, 1998EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 12, 1998EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 16, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 24, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 23, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 13, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 10, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance