Drawing for SMASH T E N N I S ATP TOUR

USPTO serial 75055608

SMASH T E N N I S ATP TOUR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EISINGER, REBECCA MILES
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SMASH T E N N I S ATP TOUR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MALCOLM MCCALEB JR

MALCOLM MCCALEB JR FOLEY & LARDNER777 E WISCONSIN AVEMILWAUKEE, WI 53202-5367UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025clothing, namely sports caps, t-shirts and sweat shirtsACTIVEMar 1, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 20, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 20, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 2, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 30, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 8, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 18, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 26, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 26, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 23, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 9, 1997DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 24, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 20, 1997DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 27, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance