USPTO serial 75055662
CITLINK.NET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CITLINK.NET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ARNOLD P LUTZKER
ARNOLD P LUTZKER LUTZKER & LUTZKER LLP1000 VERMONT AVE NW STE 450WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer equipment, namely, modems; computer software for accessing and manipulating a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | electronic mail services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network for the transfer and dissemination of a wide range of information; hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Citizens Telecommunications Company
- Other trademarks owned by Citizens Telecommunications Company
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CITLINK.NET
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 3, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 12, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 17, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 17, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 16, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 10, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 17, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |