USPTO serial 75056124
SMARTER BUILDINGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2269923Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 10, 1999
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SMARTER BUILDINGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cedar Rapids, IA
CEDAR RAPIDS, IA
Cedar Rapids, IA
Cedar Rapids, IA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James C. Nemmers
JAMES C NEMMERSP O BOX 2107CEDAR RAPIDS, IA 52406UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | business information services provided by means of a global computer network to businesses engaged in the design, development, construction, modernization and management of buildings | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Stamats Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by STAMATS BUILDINGS MEDIA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Stamats Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Stamats Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named SMARTER BUILDINGS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2010 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 10, 2004 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 11, 1999 | CNSR | ALLOWED SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 1997 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 13, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 13, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 18, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 17, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 10, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |