USPTO serial 75056479
RAZORBACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RAZORBACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ROLL-ON VEHICLES MANAGEMENT PTY LIMITED
Edgecliff, New South Wales, 2027, AU
Other trademarks owned by ROLL-ON VEHICLES MANAGEMENT PTY LIMITED
ROLL-ON VEHICLES MANAGEMENT PTY LIMITED
Edgecliff, New South Wales, 2027, AU
Other trademarks owned by ROLL-ON VEHICLES MANAGEMENT PTY LIMITED
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SEYMOUR ROTHSTEIN
SEYMOUR ROTHSTEIN BANNER & WITCOFFTEN S WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | trucks having cargo beds which may be lowered and trucks having drop beds | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2009 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 28, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 8, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 5, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 6, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |