USPTO serial 75056824
SHOWMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SZOKE, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHOWMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LEON D. ROSEN
LEON D ROSEN10960 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1434LOS ANGELES, CA 90024UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | motion picture equipment, namely, motion picture cameras, motion picture projectors, motion picture sound units in the nature of pickup circuits, amplifiers, and speakers, and exposed motion picture film | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 1997 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 22, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 1997 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Aug 26, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |