Drawing for SUPER ALKALINE

USPTO serial 75056874

SUPER ALKALINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARCUS, JAMES
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUPER ALKALINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven P. Berreth

STEVEN P BERRETH CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON KINDNESS1420 FIFTH AVESTE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-2347

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001chemicals, namely, alkaline and acidic water for use in food processing and preserving, industrial waste and agricultureABANDONED—
005alkaline and acidic water for use as a topical disinfectantABANDONED—
011water and electrolysis distilling units for producing alkaline or acidic water for use in agriculture, food processing, industrial waste treatment, and topical disinfectantsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 23, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 3, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 30, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 30, 1999EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 16, 1998CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 21, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 1997CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Sep 17, 1997JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 17, 1997EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 3, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 21, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance