USPTO serial 75056937
PEARSON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2652792Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 19, 2002
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PEARSON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London W1X 1LE, GB
London WC2R ORL, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alisa Key
Alisa Key Pearson Education, Inc.5601 Green Valley DriveBloomington, MN 55437UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | INTERACTIVE COMPACT DISCS FEATURING SCHOLASTIC EDUCATIONAL SUBJECTS, NAMELY, SCIENCE, MATH AND HISTORY; [ INTERACTIVE VIDEO TAPES, VIDEO CARTRIDGES, VIDEO CASSETTES, AND ] VIDEO DISCS FEATURING SCHOLASTIC EDUCATIONAL SUBJECTS, NAMELY, SCIENCE, MATH AND HISTORY; ELECTRONIC MULTIMEDIA PUBLICATIONS RECORDED ON CD-ROMS, NAMELY, FICTION BOOKS AND NON-FICTION BOOKS AND MAGAZINES FEATURING SCIENCE, MATH AND HISTORY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | [ MAGAZINES, JOURNALS, NEWSPAPERS AND NEWSLETTERS FEATURING FICTION AND ALSO FEATURING NON-FICTION IN THE FIELD OF SCIENCE, MATH AND HISTORY; AND ] PRINTED REPORTS AND MANUALS IN THE FIELD OF SCIENCE, MATH AND HISTORY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 25, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Mar 25, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2021 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 14, 2021 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 9, 2020 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 19, 2020 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 18, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2015 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 13, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 28, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 8, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 22, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 19, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 10, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 27, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 24, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 25, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 1998 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 17, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |