Drawing for MILLENNIUM CONFERENCE CENTRE

USPTO serial 75057097

MILLENNIUM CONFERENCE CENTRE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2107804Status 800Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 21, 1997
Examiner
BUTLER, CHERYL A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with MILLENNIUM CONFERENCE CENTRE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*

Plus Government fees of $1,300

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jason Greenberg

Jason Greenberg Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver and Jacobson LLP1 New York PlazaNew York, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035business services, namely, consultation in the areas of business, catering and hotel management of others; business advisory and consultation services relating to hotel services franchising; providing facilities for business meetingsACTIVEJul 1, 1997
043hotel concierge services; hotel services for preferred customers, making hotel reservations for others, providing facilities for conventions, food preparation, contract food services and cateringACTIVEJul 1, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 12, 2018CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2018COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 27, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2017NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2017RNL2REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jun 24, 201789AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jun 24, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 11, 2017E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2016REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2008COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Apr 14, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Dec 26, 2007AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED—
Nov 6, 2007RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Nov 6, 200789AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Nov 6, 2007PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Oct 24, 2007E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 24, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 24, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2003C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 20, 2003815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Oct 20, 2003E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 1997R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 4, 1997CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Sep 4, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 24, 1997SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 28, 1997IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 11, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 19, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 18, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 9, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 30, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance