Drawing for MAX HEADROOM

USPTO serial 75057191

MAX HEADROOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SALEMI, DOMINICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAX HEADROOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas W. Sprinkle

DOUGLAS W SPRINKLE280 N WOODWARD, STE 400BIRMINGHAM, MI 48009UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041entertainment services, namely, providing on-line computer game and musical selectionsACTIVEFeb 6, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 6, 2000ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 6, 2000ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 31, 2000ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 28, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 2000CRTPREG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY—
Aug 12, 1997R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 20, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 18, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 21, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 13, 1997CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 6, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 2, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 22, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 22, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 22, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance