USPTO serial 75057525
FLU FIGHTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 6, 1998
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FLU FIGHTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Boca Raton, FL
North Miami Beach, FL
BOCA RATON, FL
Boca Raton, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RALPH E. LOCHER
RALPH E LOCHER LERNER & GREENBERG PAPO BOX 2480HOLLYWOOD, FL 33022-2480UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | medicinal preparations, namely, prophylactic influenza medicine and symptom-reducing influenza medicine | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 21, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ARTHUR VANMOOR
- Other trademarks owned by van Moerkerken, Arthur
- Other trademarks owned by AMANDA MEDINA
- Other trademarks owned by ARTHUR VANMOOR
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named FLU FIGHTER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2009 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2004 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 21, 2004 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 1998 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 8, 1998 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 8, 1998 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 14, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 28, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |