USPTO serial 75058424
SUPRAFRAME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GREENBAUM, CINDY BETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUPRAFRAME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Melbourne, Victoria, AU
Melbourne, Victoria, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B. Murray
ROBERT B MURRAY NIKAIDO, MARMELSTEIN, MURRAY & ORAMMETROPOLITAN SQ G ST LOBBY655 15TH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-5701Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | metal building materials, namely, profiled metal sheeting, metal roof and wall cladding, metal roof and floor decking, metal panels, purlins, girts, beams, joists, stumps, bearers, studs, noggings, bracing, brackets, lintels, sills, window and door frames, doors, metal guttering and downpipes, flashing, capping, nails, screws, bolts, rivets, nuts, hinges, locks, keys and metal house framing; metal buildings and structures, namely, garages, carports, patios and sheds; kits for making metal buildings and structures such as garages, carports, patios and sheds | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 30, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 10, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 5, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 22, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 7, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |