USPTO serial 75058491
KELO-COTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 15, 2002
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with KELO-COTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Advanced Bio-Technologies, Inc.
Silverdale, WA
ADVANCED BIO-TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Cary, NC
Advanced Bio-Technologies, Inc.
Suwanee, GA
Advanced Bio-Technologies, Inc.
Silverdale, WA
Advanced Bio-Technologies, Inc.
Suwanee, GA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas A. Polcyn
Thomas A. Polcyn Thompson Coburn LLPOne US Bank PlazaSt. Louis, MO 63101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | topical gel containing silicone as the base component for treatment of damaged skin as a result of injury or surgery | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Advanced Bio-Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ADVANCED BIO-TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Advanced Bio-Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Advanced Bio-Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Advanced Bio-Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named KELO-COTE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2023 | NURC | NOTICE OF UPDATED REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2022 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2022 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 30, 2022 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 30, 2022 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 27, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 10, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2022 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 16, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 16, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 6, 2012 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 1, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 24, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 21, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 25, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 8, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 30, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 1998 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 2, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 31, 1997 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 20, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 17, 1997 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 8, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 7, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |