USPTO serial 75058510
HOW WOOD SHOULD BE TREATED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2249905Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 1, 1999
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HOW WOOD SHOULD BE TREATED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CHICAGO, IL
Hudson, OH
Hudson, OH
Hudson, OH
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | protective surface coatings in the nature of a wood finish; lacquers in the nature of a coating; varnishes; paint primers for preparing surfaces to be painted; and undercoatings for surfaces to be painted | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 2, 1999 |
| 003 | cleaning preparations for exterior wood, vinyl and aluminum surfaces | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 2, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AKZO NOBEL COATINGS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Flood Company, The
- Other trademarks owned by Flood Company, The
- Other trademarks owned by Flood Company, The
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named HOW WOOD SHOULD BE TREATED
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2010 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 1999 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 5, 1999 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 31, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 25, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 19, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 24, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 23, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 24, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 29, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 23, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |