USPTO serial 75058614
ES ERGO SENTRY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2385838Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 12, 2000
- Examiner
- BILLINGS, JESSIE W
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ES ERGO SENTRY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Plainsboro, NJ
MAGNITUDE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.
BRANCHBURG, NJ
Other trademarks owned by MAGNITUDE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.
Plainsboro, NJ
Plainsboro, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LISA B. LANE
LISA B LANE SYNNESTIVEDT & LECHNER LLPARAMARK TWR STE 26001101 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19107-2950Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software to aid in the prevention of repetitive stress injuries related to the use of computers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Magnitude, LLC.
- Other trademarks owned by MAGNITUDE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Magnitude, LLC.
- Other trademarks owned by Magnitude, LLC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ES ERGO SENTRY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 16, 2001 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 18, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 10, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 18, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 14, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 20, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 11, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |