USPTO serial 75058663
THE HEAVY HITTERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE HEAVY HITTERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ingrid E. Schmidt
INGRID E SCHMIDT ROGERS & SCOTT214 RANDALL STOAKVILLE, ON L6J 1P7CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | financial services in the nature of investment securities, namely, mutual funds, pension funds, and pooled funds; financial analysis and consultation services; investment consultation services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Chand Carmichael & Company Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Chand Carmichael & Company Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named THE HEAVY HITTERS
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 17, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 1999 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 17, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 15, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |