USPTO serial 75058671
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Hamilton, Ontario L9C 5Y4, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert F. Delbridge
ROBERT F DELBRIDGE GOWLING, STRATHY & HENDERSONP O BOX 1045, LCD 1HAMILTON, ON L8N 3R4CANADA| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | air cushioned land spraying machines | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |