USPTO serial 75058823
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William L. Feeney
WILLIAM L FEENEY KERKAM, STOWELL, KONDRACKI & CLARKETWO SKYLINE PL 5203 LEESBURG PIKESTE 600FALLS CHURCH, VA 22041| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | sheets, pillowcases, bed ruffles, pillow shams, comforters, curtains and draperies | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 1999 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 1, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 2, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |