USPTO serial 75058829
STUDENT SOFTWARE GUIDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KREBS, CATHERINE K.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STUDENT SOFTWARE GUIDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dennis T. Griggs
DENNIS T GRIGGS GRIGGS & JOHNSTON, LLPDALLAS BANK TWR STE 120012900 PRESTON RD # LB-15DALLAS, TX 75230-1329Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | distributorships in the field of computer software for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 10, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 8, 2000 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Mar 31, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 20, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 3, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 28, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 19, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |