USPTO serial 75058889
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
DEERFIELD BEACH, FL
DALLAS, TX
Fort Worth, TX
Fort Worth, TX
CAMBRIDGE, MA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM F SWIGGART
BARBARA J GRAHN ESQ OPPENHEIMER WOLFF & DONNELLY LLPSTE 3300, 45 S 7TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software designed to be a system component or quasi-system to enable one/multiple users of one/multiple global computer network access providers to log-on by using the same computer screen; thence, the user is presented with a menu screen based on the user's pre-configured software preferences for utilizing the features of the global computer network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 1997 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2003 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 19, 2003 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2003 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | 15AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 1999 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 9, 1999 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 9, 1999 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 26, 1998 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 19, 1997 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 30, 1997 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 30, 1997 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 13, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 13, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |