USPTO serial 75059357
DELIVER ME HOME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 12, 2000
- Examiner
- VAVONESE, DANIEL P
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with DELIVER ME HOME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Wichita, KS
NATIONAL CENTER FOR MISSING AND EXPLOITED CHILDREN
Alexandria, VA
Other trademarks owned by NATIONAL CENTER FOR MISSING AND EXPLOITED CHILDREN
NATIONAL CENTER FOR MISSING AND EXPLOITED CHILDREN
ARLINGTON, VA
Other trademarks owned by NATIONAL CENTER FOR MISSING AND EXPLOITED CHILDREN
Wichita, KS
WICHITA, KS
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dusan Clark
Dusan Clark SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP2021 McKinney Avenue, Suite 2000Dallas, TX 75201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | promoting public awareness of missing children and child abduction prevention; dissemination of photographs and data regarding missing children via printed mediums | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pizza Hut, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by NATIONAL CENTER FOR MISSING AND EXPLOITED CHILDREN
- Other trademarks owned by NATIONAL CENTER FOR MISSING AND EXPLOITED CHILDREN
- Other trademarks owned by Pizza Hut, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by PIZZA HUT, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DELIVER ME HOME
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2020 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 24, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 24, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 8, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2010 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 11, 2010 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 10, 2010 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 22, 2006 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2001 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 25, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 3, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 1998 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 22, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 26, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 29, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 27, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |