USPTO serial 75059549
VAULT CARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLEMBOCKI, ERICA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VAULT CARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Costa Mesa, CA
Costa Mesa, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEANA SCIARAPPA SCHOTT
JEANA SCIARAPPA SCHOTT Law Office Jeana Sciarappa Schott, Esq.36 AndiamoNewport Coast, CA 92657UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | self-verifying magnetic, smart, credit, debit, or identification card with an on-card pin interface system for use in credit, digital, cash, stored value, electronic fund and purchase, bioassaying, and record storage cards | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | banking services, credit card services, debit card services, phone card services, travel agency, namely, issuing traveler's checks, and automated teller machine services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 16, 1999 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Mar 15, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1998 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 16, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 9, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 5, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |