USPTO serial 75059896
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Rawdon, LEEDS LS19 6LG, GB
Rawdon, Leeds LS19 6LG, GB
ALBION MILLS, BRADFORD, GB
Rawdon, Leeds LS19 6LG, GB
Rawdon, LEEDS LS19 6LG, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RONALD E. SHAPIRO
RONALD E SHAPIRO MILES & STOCKBRIDGE PC1751 PINNACLE DR STE 500MCLEAN, VA 22102-3833UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | applying finishes to cloth fabrics, namely, imparting stretch to fabrics | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 15, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2011 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 4, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 3, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 2, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 24, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 11, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 15, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 2, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |