Drawing for JDBC COMPLIANT

USPTO serial 75059968

JDBC COMPLIANT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CATALDO, PETER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JDBC COMPLIANT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sally M. Abel

SALLY M ABEL ESQ FENWICK & WEST LLPSILICON VLY CTR801 CALIFORNIA STMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 93635

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer hardware, computer programs used in accessing databases, and instructional manuals supplied as a unit therewithABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 11, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 1998ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 10, 1998EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 10, 1998EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Nov 26, 1997EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 26, 1997EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 20, 1997EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 20, 1997EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 28, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 18, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 12, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance