USPTO serial 75060134
THUMBS UP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THUMBS UP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
North Vancouver, B.C. V7P 1V5, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KiSong Kim Lang-Caditz
KISONG KIM LANG-CADITZ CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON & KINDNESS1420 FIFTH AVESTE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-2347Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | fragrances for use in toiletries and cosmetics | ACTIVE | — |
| 003 | shaving gels, shaving lotions, shaving creams, shaving balms, after shave lotions, facial lotions, body lotions, soaps for hands, face and body, deodorants and antiperspirants | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | clothing, namely, shirts, hats, pants, sweatshirts, T-shirts, aprons, and overcoats | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 14, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |