USPTO serial 75060609
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Judith Keene Rosenblum
BARBARA WEIL GALL SHERMAN & HOWARD633 17TH ST STE 3000DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | charitable fundraising | ACTIVE | Nov 28, 1995 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 16, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 16, 2000 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 11, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 2, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 3, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 19, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 17, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |