USPTO serial 75060790
SEARCH.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THAYER, GARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SEARCH.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDREW P. BRIDGES
ANDREW P BRIDGES WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH ROSATI650 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1015UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | providing services for searching or browsing or electronic communications networks, or for electronic delivery of computer software or of a wide range of educational or entertainment matter | ACTIVE | Mar 18, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 4, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 4, 2000 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 9, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 29, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 1998 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 23, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 26, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 17, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 31, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |