Drawing for BRANDED RESTAURANT GROUP

USPTO serial 75060957

BRANDED RESTAURANT GROUP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRANDED RESTAURANT GROUP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paula M. Taffe

PAULA M TAFFE KRAFT FOODS, INCTHREE LAKES DR - NF-351NORTHFIELD, IL 60093-2753UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035rranchising restaurantsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 21, 2000ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jan 25, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 23, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 24, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 24, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 8, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 7, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 16, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 23, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 14, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 26, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 27, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 22, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 12, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance