USPTO serial 75061198
NEBULA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NEBULA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David N. Johnson
ANGIE WARREN - #339 HALLMARK CARDS, INCORPORATEDP O BOX 419126KANSAS CITY, MO 64141-6126UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | toys and games, namely, toy action figures, toy vehicles, playsets for recreational use, rubber action balls, sports balls, beach balls, construction toy sets, costume masks, toy model hobby craft kits, play houses, plush toys, play swimming pools, jigsaw puzzles, manipulative puzzles, radio controlled and remote control vehicles, ride-on toy vehicles, toy walkie-talkies, slot racing toy vehicles, target games, electric action view toys, water pistols, toy guns, balloons, Christmas tree ornaments, yo-yo's, flying discs, roller skates, skateboards, and hand-held child's toy slide projectors for viewing cels from movies and television | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 13, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 10, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |