USPTO serial 75061244
CYBER DOLLAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BILLINGS, JESSIE W
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CYBER DOLLAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
1098 VA, Amsterdam, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE A. DREMONAS
GEORGE A DREMONAS BARNES & THORNBURG1313 MERCHANTS BANK BLDG11 S MERIDIAN STINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | software development and design services for others; software updating; computer hardware and software rental services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 6, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 19, 1999 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 10, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 22, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 22, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 28, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |