USPTO serial 75061308
DERMA-CLEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DERMA-CLEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | bleaching preparation and other substances for laundry use; polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations; soaps; perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions; dentifrices | ACTIVE | Sep 20, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |