Drawing for TIGER

USPTO serial 75061317

TIGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ZERVAS, ALBERT JAMES
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TIGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karla Shippey

KARLA SHIPPEY HILBORNE, HAWKIN & CO2534 N SANTIAGO BLVDORANGE, CA 92667UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008scissors, hairdressing scissors, barber scissors, pruning shearsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 15, 1997ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 1, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 11, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 15, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 26, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 1996IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Aug 12, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 17, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 5, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance