USPTO serial 75061500
D-AMPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MERMELSTEIN, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with D-AMPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adrienne L. White
ADRIENNE L WHITE BURNS, DOANE, SWECKER & MATHIS, LLPPOST OFFICE 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | telecommunications equipment, namely telephone switches, telephone or radio base stations for transmission of voice and data, computer based telephone switches for mobile switching center (MSC), home location register (HLR), or service control point (SCP) for implementing intelligent network services, computer based telephone switches used as multi-media platforms enabling messaging applications, mobile telephones, telephone modems, antennas, digital and analog radio transmitters and receivers, facsimile machines; computer programs for traffic handling within a mobile telephone system, for provision of voice channels and hand-offs between radio cells, for keeping information about the radio subscriber location, for provision of data for communication between telephone switches, for administration of mobile subscriber data, for maintenance of base stations for telephone or data communications, and for radio network performance supervision and statistics | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | telecommunications services, namely cellular telephone services; long distance or local distance telephone services; electronic transmission of messages and images; providing information about management, operation, or maintenance of cellular telephone systems | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson
- Other trademarks owned by Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named D-AMPS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 6, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 21, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 21, 1998 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 14, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 27, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 12, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 1996 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 6, 1996 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Aug 19, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 21, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 9, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |