USPTO serial 75061755
CUSTOMERLINK TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PESKA, KEVIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CUSTOMERLINK TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard J. Groos
RICHARD J GROOS ARNOLD, WHITE & DURKEEP O BOX 4433HOUSTON, TX 77210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | database management software and manuals supplied therewith | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | printed reports containing customer information and profile listings | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | database marketing and program communication services, namely, business consultation regarding database marketing programs; business consultation and assistance in creating direct marketing and one-to-one marketing, and in creating and maintaining customer interaction and dialog, building customer relationships and customer retention programs; collecting, maintaining and providing business information relating to customers; rental of customer lists; and providing customer information by global computer networks; and computerized database management and consultation therefore | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Guest Information Network, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Guest Information Network, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named CUSTOMERLINK TECHNOLOGIES
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 10, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 24, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 2, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |