USPTO serial 75062033
WON'T FLOAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2181601Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 11, 1998
- Examiner
- LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WON'T FLOAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lake City, FL
Lake City, FL
CORBITT MANUFACTURING COMPANY, LLC
LAKE CITY, FL
Other trademarks owned by CORBITT MANUFACTURING COMPANY, LLC
ATLANTA, GA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Lewis
900 Ashwood ParkwayOldcastle Law GroupAtlanta, GA 30338Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | mulch | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 30, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Corbitt Manufacturing
- Other trademarks owned by Corbitt Manufacturing
- Other trademarks owned by CORBITT MANUFACTURING COMPANY, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by OLDCASTLE LAWN & GARDEN, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named WON'T FLOAT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 8, 2008 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 15, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 1998 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 16, 1998 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 16, 1998 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 12, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 4, 1998 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 1998 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Apr 24, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 12, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 12, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 18, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |