USPTO serial 75062450
F FLASHNET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with F FLASHNET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Molly Buck Richard
MOLLY BUCK RICHARD STRASBURGER & PRICE, LLP600 CONGRESS AVESTE 600AUSTIN, TX 78701Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network for the transfer and dissemination of a wide range of information | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Website Management Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by PRODIGY COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks owned by Website Management Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named F FLASHNET
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 10, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 23, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 20, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |