USPTO serial 75063533
DIGITAL RETAIL WEEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THAYER, GARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIGITAL RETAIL WEEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James E. Rosini
JAMES E ROSINI KENYON & KENYONONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | computer services, namely, providing online publications, namely, magazines and newspapers, and information about information technology marketing and distribution; providing multiple user access to a global computer network for the transfer and dissemination of information about information technology marketing and distribution | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 18, 1999 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 18, 1998 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 23, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 15, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 29, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 5, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 27, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |