Drawing for WEBVISION

USPTO serial 75063957

WEBVISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2078764Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 15, 1997
Examiner
ZAK, HENRY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WEBVISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas R. Wolf

INTERACTIVE PROCESS CONTROLS CORP117 EASTMAN STSOUTH EASTON, MA 02375UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software and hardware for inspecting packaging information distributed or sold to manufacturesSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDFeb 14, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 26, 2001C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Jul 26, 2001CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 28, 2001CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Jul 29, 2000PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 15, 1997R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 22, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 21, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 25, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 20, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 20, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 25, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 25, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 11, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance