USPTO serial 75064118
ACTI-VITA MONTEIL PARIS TOTAL FACE LIFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACTI-VITA MONTEIL PARIS TOTAL FACE LIFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LUDWIGSHAFEN, DE
LUDWIGSHAFEN, DE
D-67059 Ludwigshafen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NICOLE J GALLO
NICOLE J GALLO OPPENHEIMER WOLFF & DONNELLYONE CITICORP CTR153 E 53RD STNEW YORK, NY 10022-4641Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | perfumes, toilette water, cologne, essential oils for personal use, antiperspirants, deodorants for personal use, body creams, body milks, body lotions, shaving foams, shaving creams, aftershave lotion, dusting powders, talcum powder, shower gel and bath gel and soaps for personal use, cosmetics, namely, mascara, liquid eyeliner, eye make-up, eyeliner pencil, eyeshadow, lipstick, lip gloss, nail polish, compact powder make-up, compact cream make-up, powder blusher and face powder and hair shampoos, hair conditioners, hair moisturizers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LANCASTER GROUP GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by LANCASTER GROUP GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by Lancaster Group AG
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named ACTI-VITA MONTEIL PARIS TOTAL FACE LIFT
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 17, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 13, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 12, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 9, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 31, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |