USPTO serial 75064573
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William O. Ferron
WILLIAM O FERRON6300 COLUMBIA CTR701 FIFTH AVESEATTLE, WA 98104-7092CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 21, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 29, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 28, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 16, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |