Drawing for ONE TOUCH

USPTO serial 75064635

ONE TOUCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ATCHISON, ALAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ONE TOUCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Wayne A. Silvertson

WAYNE A SILVERTSON NAWROCKI, ROONEY & SILVERTSON, PASTE 401 BROADWAY PL E3433 BROADWAY ST NWMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55413-3009

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009marketing management software, namely, software which connects sales personnel with a company's home office for use in transmitting sales information between sales personnel and the home office by means of a global computer networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 31, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 31, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 2, 1999EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 20, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 17, 1998CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jan 7, 1998JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 7, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 28, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 1, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 21, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance