Drawing for NEXT TO THE BREAST. IT'S THE BEST.

USPTO serial 75064873

NEXT TO THE BREAST. IT'S THE BEST.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DONINGER, CHRISTOPHER G
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEXT TO THE BREAST. IT'S THE BEST.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010baby bottles, nipples and infant feeding system comprised of disposable nursing bottles, nursing nipples, and disposable nursing bottle holders and capsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 10, 2001EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 23, 2001PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 16, 2001EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 10, 2001EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 1, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2000EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 20, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 20, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 20, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 5, 2000EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 17, 2000EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 21, 1999EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 17, 1999EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 12, 1999EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 12, 1999EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 17, 1998NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 7, 1998PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 28, 1998PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 1997IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
May 6, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 11, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 10, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 6, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 21, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 6, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance