USPTO serial 75065198
KLYMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KLYMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Burnsville, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERIC O HAUGEN
ERIC O HAUGEN HAUGEN LAW FIRM PLLP1130 TCF TWR121 S EIGHTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | T-shirts; hats; sweatshirts; polo shirts; shorts; tank tops; and ski gaiters, sold and marketed to those interested in snowmobiling and personal watercraft usage | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 13, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 13, 1999 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 19, 1998 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 1, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 2, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 3, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |