USPTO serial 75065333
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN P REINER
JOHN P REINER WHITE & CASE1155 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | dinner sets composed of plates, bowls, cups and saucers; tea sets composed of cups, saucers, and tea pots (non-electric and not of precious metal); coffee sets composed of cups, saucers and coffee pots (non-electric and not of precious metal); plates, namely, dinner plates, salad plates, dessert plates, bread plates, butter plates, soup plates and saucer plates; cookware, namely, saucepans, sauce pots and frying pans; drinking vessels, namely, tumblers, goblets, cups; vessels, namely, tea and coffee pots (non-electric and not of precious metal), milk jugs, cream pitchers, soup cups, dishes, namely, butter dishes; holloware, namely, gratin dishes, sauce boats, casserole dishes, vases; sugar basins; salt and pepper shakers; containers for household or kitchen use not of precious metal | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 27, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |