USPTO serial 75065583
TWENTY FIRST CENTURY FOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TWENTY FIRST CENTURY FOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY A SMITH
JON DEL BARRIO FOX GROUP LEGALINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEPTPO BOX 900BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90213Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | motion picture films featuring action, adventure, dramatic, comedic and documentary themes; pre-recorded video cassettes, pre-recorded video tapes, pre-recorded videodiscs, pre-recorded audio cassettes, pre-recorded audio tapes, pre-recorded audio compact discs, phonograph records, computer software programs and CD-ROMS, all featuring entertainment, action, adventure, dramatic, comedic and documentray themes and musical performances; musical sound recordings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named TWENTY FIRST CENTURY FOX
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 26, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 14, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 1, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 26, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 2, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 19, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 11, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 25, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |